Wednesday, May 13, 2009

“Is it possible that some women may choose to undergo female circumcision?”

“Is it possible that some women may elect to undergo female circumcision?” This was the question that popped up on my face book after I had joined a group against Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). Some may want to get into a debate on the term FGM. There is a difference. The practices vary from circumcision which involves cutting the tip of the clitoris. Then there is what couldn’t really be called circumcision, it involves removing everything except for a tiny opening to pass water and for an excruciatingly painful intercourse. That is mutilation and any other name is nothing more than euphemism. There is also something called introcision involving an elderly man who enlarges the girl’s vaginal orifice by tearing it downward with three fingers bound with a string or a stone knife.

Back to the question, luckily I know the person who asked about women who may chose to be circumcised. He is someone who applies his mind. So instead of flipping out, I probed him to say more because I was genuinely curious of someone’s take that is different from those who blindly follow certain causes just because they are fashionable. I also thought it would be interesting to get a man’s perspective on an issue that I normally discuss with women.

I suspected that what may have been the issue for J was how most Westerners cry barbarism in most of African cultural practices. Like him I find that kind of empty cultural arrogance offensive. But his argument went further to point out that “there was this other issue about individual rights and freedoms. The right to determine for oneself what is wrong or right, good, bad or even harmful. Remember in South Africa people died for these rights. The liberation movement was pretty much about these rights, the right to determine our own destiny.”


Again this was the point I fully support. I am all for basic reasonable codes that serve as a form of social cohesion to avoid chaos but when they begin to take away my personal choice I balk. I begin to have a problem, when certain practices in culture pay unwanted attention on girls body parts to control procreation. I am enraged when it comes to a fact that such acts as FGM and circumcision are performed not on women but on girls. I am all for women making their own choices, but the thing is that infant girls and teenagers do not have a choice.


Sadly, the elderly women who oversee these practices have always been custodians of frozen tradition, how things were in their days. This is where the power of hegemony lies, it ensures that the practice is approved and seen as way of life by elders including women themselves.


As for Westerners thinking their cultures are clean and superior, it should be duly noted that FGM or female circumcision is not a uniquely African cultural practices. History would show that:
“The origin of FGM has not yet been established, but records show that the practice
predates Christianity and Islam in practising communities of today. In ancient Rome,
metal rings were passed through the labia minora of slaves to prevent procreation; in
medieval England, metal chastity belts were worn by women to prevent promiscuity
during their husbands' absence; evidence from mummified bodies reveals that, in ancient
Egypt, both excision and infibulation were performed, hence Pharaonic circumcision; in
tsarist Russia, as well as nineteenth-century England, France and America,
records indicate the practice of clitoridectomy. In England and America, FGM was
performed on women as a "cure" for numerous psychological ailments.” (UNCHR, Fact
Sheet No.23,)

As the global village becomes smaller, I have had the pleasure of befriending women who at a tender age have had to endure unimaginable pain of being circumcised . The issue of sex for them is a thorny issues. Excuse the pun since some them were literally stitched with thorns.

The question however remains, is it possible that there could be women out there who would offer to be circumcised and be left nothing but a tiny bit to pee with? Well, we have people piercing every part of their body. We have people who inject poison on their lips and faces, we have those who have operated on their tongues to a shape similar to snakes or kept they nails until they look like claws. People have done amazing sometimes bizarre things to their bodies. They have one thing in common – Choice. They chose. So yes J, there is a possibility that some adult women may choose to do it. But genitally mutilated and circumcised girls are mostly pinned down kicking and screaming and bleeding and shitting scared.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Do pardon my tardy response.

Damn.. Futhi, "cutting everything except for the little opening reserved for water passing"?! These are indeed gruesome acts. That's definately mutilation... no other way of putting it.
And you're right, my issue is not necessarily about this gruesome act perse. I agree entirely with this course. The other point i was trying to make was our tendency to employ too much emotions on certain issues. We get too caught up in our emotions and as a result fail to communicate effectively what our course is all about.

For instance, because my girlfriend who sometimes does the proofreading for me, was not around - i gave my piece to a colleague of mine at work to proof read. Before even finishing the thing...she was all up in a rage. But i told her, that's exactly the point i'm trying to drive. When we get too emotional, the real message tends to fall in the little emotional cracks, we fail to fully understand the topic for...well, there's nothing to understand - there's a catastrophe! But i know, this often happens when we deal with serious matters such as HIV. We all don't want to ask the questions we have (even controversial) because we might be viewed as denialist or this or that...the problem is we were taught to ask questions, satisfy ourselves with issues so that we a better able to defend and communicate better. But our society likes sensational stuff. People always wants to appeal to your emotions, as if there isn't really a rational case to make of the issue.

My view is that if we're sure about what we're saying, and truely believe in the originality and veracity of the wrong things happening, and wanting to communicate clearly, we should not seek to be evasive. We must communicate clearly without any doubt - equally encouraging those who genuinely seek to understand better, to ask question.

Futhi said...

Thanks Jo,

Well :) if we don't call it by name it remains hidden and some can even say it's not that bad. It is that bad and more. Like Apartheid and bigotry - a discussion that is a good bedfellow with emotions.

You are right about emotionality getting in a way of a necessary discussion. We are censored by this lovely subtle hegemony of political correctness.

I hope your colleague got to see the point you were getting at. I bet you, your girlfriend would have been mad too at the beginning unless she knows you well by now.

Anyway thanks for this, discussion can be laid to rest. Although some girls somewhere continue to undergo unbelievable pain for the pleasure of some old guy.